Long-term Medicaid has income eligibility requirements (in addition to resource limits and
other requirements) in certain states such as Texas (an “income cap” state). As of January
1, 2025, the gross income cap is $2,901 per month. If an individual is applying for Medicaid
and has income over the cap, a Qualified Income Trust document can be created and a
Qualified Income Trust bank account can be opened to place the monthly income (not
resources) into the account which will allow the individual who is applying for Medicaid to
meet the income eligibility requirement. Qualified Income Trusts are also known as “QITs”
or “Miller Trusts.”
				 
							
					
					It depends on the income of the respective spouses and what strategy is employed. If
the income of the community spouse is greater than what is called the minimum monthly
maintenance needs allowance (“MMMNA” is $3,948 as of January 1, 2025), then there are
limited situations when a court order can be obtained to divert income from his or her
institutionalized spouse so that his or her income is above the MMMNA. If there is a “spend
down” of countable resources and the income of the community spouse is lower than the
MMMNA, then sometimes there can be a diversion of income from the institutionalized
spouse to the community spouse so that the community spouse has income up to the
MMMNA limit. However, it is often best to not “spend down”, so this situation must be
carefully reviewed with your experienced elder law attorney. If the combined non-countable
resource income is less than the MMMNA, then often all of the income can be diverted to
the community spouse.
				 
							
					
					Under the Texas Medicaid Estate Recovery Program, the state has a right to make a
claim against the probate estate of the Medicaid recipient to the extent that Medicaid
benefits have been advanced if the Medicaid recipient applied for Medicaid on or after
March 1, 2005. There are several exceptions to the rule (i.e., if there is a surviving spouse,
if there is an unmarried adult child living in the home for one year prior to the death of the
Medicaid recipient, if there is a Ladybird deed or Transfer on Death deed, or if there is a
disabled child of the Medicaid recipient). Furthermore, there are some Medicaid programs
such as the Community Attendant Services and Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB)
which are excluded from estate recovery. Presently, there are also several planning
methods to avoid the claim of the state against the home (not to mention other non-
countable resources such as a car and a business).
				 
							
					
					Transferring assets can result in a penalty causing ineligibility for long-term care
Medicaid. There are some exceptions to the rule (particularly with regard to disabled
children). Transfers for less than fair market value are subject to a 5-year look-back period.
The transfer penalty period resulting in ineligibility for long-term care Medicaid starts from
the date of application and from when one is otherwise eligible for long-term care Medicaid.
The presumption is that any uncompensated transfer (even a gift to a charitable
organization) within the 5-year look-back period was done for the purpose of obtaining
Medicaid benefits. So, if you made a gift to a charitable organization and 4 years later you
had a stroke and applied for Medicaid, the presumption is that the gift 4 years earlier was
for purposes of obtaining Medicaid and the period of ineligibility would start when such
person applied (assuming it was within 5 years of the uncompensated transfer) and is
otherwise eligible for long-term care Medicaid and not from when one made the transfer.
The applicant would need to rebut the presumption by claiming it was done for a purpose
other than for purposes of qualifying for Medicaid. There are still planning strategies
presently available for asset preservation – even for transfers within the 5-year look-back
period. The transfer penalty divisor (representing the average daily cost of a nursing home
in Texas) is $262.37.
				 
							
					
					See above. The annual gift tax exclusion ($19,000 per person in year 2025) under
Internal Revenue Code Provisions is still subject to the Medicaid transfer penalty rules. So,
the transfer could result in a transfer penalty – depending on when the uncompensated
transfer was made and if there was an existing transfer penalty and if the transfer was to a
disabled child or under some other exception to the transfer penalty rules.
				 
							
					
					Most assets that can be converted to cash are considered countable (such as the cash
surrender value of life insurance policies if the face value of the policy exceeds $1,500,
stocks, mutual funds, bank accounts, deferred annuities, etc.). Such resources are
considered in determining Medicaid eligibility. Excluded (non-countable) resources for
Medicaid eligibility include, but are not limited to, the homestead; one car; pre-need funeral;
a burial space for the applicant and family members; term life insurance; personal property
items; traditional IRAs if required minimum distributions (RMDs) are being made; or IRA
where no RMD is required (i.e. Roth or under the age for RMD) if the investment within the
IRA is an annuity; a business essential for self-support; or certain mineral interests if limited
value, etc.
				 
							
					
					It is assumed that the account all belongs to the applicant unless it could be proven
otherwise.
				 
							
							
					
					It depends on the factual situation. With the rule change which became effective as of
September 1, 2004, “Medicaid annuities” became more popular when there is an
institutionalized spouse and a community spouse, and their total non-countable resource
income exceeds or is close to the MMMNA ($3,948 as of January 1, 2025). Before one
makes a decision one should consider all of the options. Be wary of anyone who advises
this is the only option.
				 
							
					
					Yes, so there should be planning which is often why some create Special Needs Trusts
within a will. It should also be noted that Texas permits reformation of Wills if public benefits
of the beneficiary are jeopardized as a result of the inheritance.
				 
							
					
					Depending on the income of the community spouse and other factors, often the answer
is “Yes”.